The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms produced this bumper sticker, which seems appropriate to the Western Journal’s online survey about gun control.

A recent online survey by the Western Journal — which probably would not meet scientific standards — provided an opportunity for the firearms community to weigh in where other polls never seem to relay the ferocity of opposition to gun control.

So, when the Western Journal asked, “Should there be more restrictions on guns rights?” the reaction was an overwhelming “No.” When last I checked on the numbers, only 9.98% of respondents, all 806 of them, said, “Yes.” Custer faced better odds at the Little Bighorn, as a crushing 90.02% responded in the negative, a total of 7,269 votes.

Of course, there might have been some double votes, but even if only half of all those “No” votes were valid, there would still be 3,634 voices against more restrictions, roughly 4.5 times as many as those calling for more restrictions.

One might suspect most of those numbers came in after the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in June. That 6-3 decision has resulted in something of a political ripple effect, producing some things a lot of people haven’t heard about.

Message to Colorado gun control proponents. Watch for this bumper sticker in the Centennial State.

In the aftermath of Bruen, some states essentially nullified the offensive requirement of concealed carry permit applicants to provide “good cause” to be armed. Almost reflexively, stubborn anti-gun politicians in New York, New Jersey and California immediately instituted other mandates in an effort to dance around the decision and keep gun owners on a leash.

However, out in Colorado, something interesting happened. The town of Superior had adopted a ban on so-called “assault weapons” and grassroots activists quickly took the town, and the local sheriff, to federal court. Late last month, U.S. District Judge Raymond P. Moore issued a temporary restraining order against enforcement of the ban. The order had a 14-day time limit.

According to the Denver Gazette, Judge Moore’s order blocked the gun ban and a prohibition on so-called “illegal weapons,” whatever those are. Somewhere in that mix were gun magazines holding more than ten rounds.

While assuring the town he had some sympathy for its gun control effort, the judge noted in his opinion, “(T)he Court is unaware of historical precedent that would permit a governmental entity to entirely ban a type of weapon that is commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, whether in an individual’s home or in public.”

The offensive ordinance included a definition of an “assault weapon” that translates to semiautomatic, centerfire rifles. Owners of such guns would have until Dec. 31 to get a “certificate of ownership” from the Boulder County Sheriff’s Department.

Plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit contend provisions in Ordinance 0-9 violate the Second Amendment, and don’t sell that idea short. Ever since the 2010 high court ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the 14th Amendment, every state, county and municipal gun control action must now pass the constitutional smell test.

The case is known as Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al. v. The Town of Superior et al.

According to CBS News, Rocky Mountain Gun Owners Executive Director Taylor said the small victory is “a sign of what’s to come.” He’s got a point. In other states, notably California, Washington, New York and Massachusetts, gun owners are rallying against efforts by anti-gun politicians at all levels to essentially ignore the Bruen ruling and carry on as though nothing of importance had happened.

It could become a spectator sport just to see how far the high court will allow these efforts to go before smacking them down.

Gun control fanatics hate it when monthly reports from the National Instant Check System (NICS) show continued healthy background check numbers, which translate in part to completed gun sales.

The first half of 2022 saw 15,868,017 initiated NICS checks, which included 2,570,608 checks in June. At this point, the National Shooting Sports Foundation weighs in with its “adjusted figure” which is reached by “subtracting the NICS purpose code permit checks and permit rechecks used by states for CCW permit application checks and checks on active CCW permit databases,” NSSF explains.

According to the industry group’s data adjustment, June NICS numbers related to gun sales reflect an 8.1% growth over the number of such checks in June 2021. NSSF also reported, “The second quarter 2022 NSSF-adjusted NICS figure of 3.92 million reflects a decrease of 8.9 percent compared to the second quarter 2021 figure of 4.3 million. Historically, this is the third-highest second quarter on record.”

Veteran U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is in a bit of trouble back home very few outside of the Bluegrass State heard about.

After McConnell, who is the Senate Minority Leader, recently received a bad tiding from the Republican Party of Jessamine County. They censured McConnell for his support of the recently adopted “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act,” a gun control measure.

According to the Louisville Courier-Journal, the censure resolution said the bill, passed on the day after the Supreme Court handed down its Bruen ruling, “violates the Second, Fifth and 14th amendments.”

The resolution, said the newspaper, also called on McConnell to resign as Republican leader. The Jessamine County group “shall cease any and all support” of McConnell because of his support for the gun control compromise package.

The federal legislation was quickly adopted in response to mass shootings in New York and Texas.

Where McConnell was targeted for local censure, another Republican politician called it quits as he was preparing for a re-election campaign because the mass shooting at a Tops supermarket in Buffalo, N.Y. was very close to home.

Congressman Chris Jacobs, according to a report in the Buffalo News, committed what might be considered political suicide by jumping across the aisle to vote with House Democrats supporting legislation to ban so-called “assault weapons.”

This was no small occurrence. According to the Buffalo News, Jacobs had just been filming an ad for his re-election campaign, along with sportsmen and gun rights activists in his 27th District in northern New York right near Buffalo. Now he’s not running for another term at all.

The newspaper account said Jacobs has had support from hunters and gun owners, but after the Tops mass shooting he “began to see the world differently.” The reaction from people described as “Republican and Conservative leaders” was a demand Jacobs’ “removal from the congressional race.”

The midterm election is shaping up as a no-holds-barred political brawl, with gun rights in the spotlight. As this report was being written, there was not an indication who might jump into the race to replace Jacobs. 

The acting attorney general of New Jersey, Matthew Platkin, announced last month the creation of a new office in the Garden State, and its sole purpose is to sue firearms companies.

According to NJ Advance Media, the Statewide Affirmative Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) office will “bring civil enforcement actions against gunmakers and dealers that ‘knowingly or recklessly contribute to a public nuisance in New Jersey through unlawful or unreasonable conduct.’” This followed on the heels of a new law signed by anti-gun Democrat Gov. Phil Murphy allowing such lawsuits.

Apparently, Murphy and Platkin think they can successfully challenge the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by then-President George W. Bush. PLCAA was passed to prevent the kind of harassment legal actions being cooked up in New Jersey that are, according to some critics, designed to cost the firearms industry small fortunes in legal fees, thus crippling their bottom line.

The report said this new office “will be helmed by a director and staffed with attorneys and investigators.”

The announcement drew quick criticism on social media. One gun owner observed on Twitter, “They should stop selling weapons and ammo to states that have clearly demonstrated that they can’t be trusted,” an interesting idea, which brought this, among other reactions: “We’re better off without New Jersey than without gun manufacturers.”

(I) Giveaway ends June 30, 2022. All entries must be received by giveaway end date. Mail-in entries accepted; send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, GOM October 2022, P.O. Box 488, Escondido, CA 92033. Deployed military should use stateside address. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household; multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Contest open to U.S. residents only. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. are not eligible. No purchase necessary. Contest void where prohibited by law. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (if required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Factory warranties may apply in some cases.

(I) Giveaway ends September 30, 2022. All entries must be received by giveaway end date. Mail-in entries accepted; send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, GOM September 2022, P.O. Box 488, Escondido, CA 92033. Deployed military should use stateside address. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household; multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Contest open to U.S. residents only. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. are not eligible. No purchase necessary. Contest void where prohibited by law. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (when required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Factory warranties may apply in some cases.

(I) Giveaway ends August 31, 2022. All entries must be received by giveaway end date. Mail-in entries accepted; send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, GOM August 2022, P.O. Box 488, Escondido, CA 92033. Deployed military should use stateside address. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household; multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Contest open to U.S. residents only. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. are not eligible. No purchase necessary. Contest void where prohibited by law. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (if required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Factory warranties may apply in some cases.

(I) Giveaway ends July 31, 2022. All entries must be received by giveaway end date. Mail-in entries accepted; send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, GOM Surplus 2022, PO Box 488, Escondido, CA 92033. Deployed military should use stateside address. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household; multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Contest open to U.S. residents only. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. are not eligible. No purchase necessary. Contest void where prohibited by law. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (if required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Factory warranties may apply in some cases.

(I) Giveaway ends July 31, 2022. All entries must be received by giveaway end date. Mail-in entries accepted; send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, GOM July 2022, P.O. Box 502795, San Diego, CA 92150-1377. Deployed military should use stateside address. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household; multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Contest open to U.S. residents only. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. are not eligible. No purchase necessary. Contest void where prohibited by law. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (if required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Factory warranties may apply in some cases.

(I) Giveaway ends September 30, 2021. All entries must be received by giveaway end date. Mail-in entries accepted; send postcards (no envelopes) to: GUNS Magazine, Altor Pistols, P.O. Box 502795, San Diego, CA 92150-1377. Deployed military should use stateside address. (II) Limit one (1) entry per household; multiple entries will disqualify entrants. Contest open to U.S. residents only. Employees and agents of Publishers’ Development Corp. are not eligible. No purchase necessary. Contest void where prohibited by law. (III) Giveaway winner(s) chosen by random drawing. Winners will be notified by certified mail on official letterhead. Winners must respond within 30 days of receiving notification or an alternate winner will be selected. To protect the privacy and security of winners, names will not be made public. (IV) Winners must undergo a background check (when required) and comply with all other federal, state and local laws. Prizes will not be awarded if illegal in jurisdiction of winners. No substitutions or transfers to third parties allowed. Associated taxes and fees are the responsibility of winners. Giveaway prizes may have evidence of being test fired or exhibit minor handling marks. Factory warranties may apply in some cases.

State Agency: Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection

State Agency: Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks & Tourism

State Agency: Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife

New Jersey Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: New Jersey Division of Fish & Wildlife

State Agency: Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

State Agency: Wyoming Game & Fish Department

State Agency: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

West Virginia Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: West Virginia Division of Natural Resources

State Agency: Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife

State Agency: Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources

State Agency: Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department

State Agency: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources

State Agency: Texas Parks & Wildlife Department

State Agency: Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency

South Dakota Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks

South Carolina Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

Rhode Island Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: Rhode Island Department of Fish & Wildlife

State Agency: Pennsylvania Game Commission

State Agency: Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife

State Agency: Ohio Division of Wildlife

North Dakota Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: North Dakota Game & Fish Department

North Carolina Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission

New York Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: New York Department of Environmental Conservation

New Mexico Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: New Mexico Department of Game & Fish

New Hampshire Online Hunter Safety

State Agency: New Hampshire Fish & Game Department

State Agency: Nevada Department of Wildlife

State Agency: Nebraska Game & Parks Commission

State Agency: Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks

State Agency: Mississippi Deptartment of Wildlife, Fisheries & Parks

State Agency: Missouri Deptartment of Conservation

State Agency: Minnesota Deptartment of Natural Resources

State Agency: Michigan Deptartment of Natural Resources

State Agency: Maryland Department of Natural Resources

State Agency: Maine Department of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife

State Agency: Louisiana Department of Wildlife & Fisheries

State Agency: Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources

State Agency: Iowa Department of Natural Resources

State Agency: Indiana Department of Natural Resources

State Agency: Illinois Department of Natural Resources

State Agency: Idaho Department of Fish & Game

State Agency: Hawaii Department of Land & Natural Resources

State Agency: Georgia Department of Natural Resources

State Agency: Delaware Division of Fish & Wildlife

State Agency: Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission

State Agency: Colorado Parks & Wildlife

State Agency: California Department of Fish & Wildlife

State Agency: Arkansas Game & Fish Commission

State Agency: Arizona Game & Fish Department

State Agency: Alaska Department of Fish & Game

State Agency: Alabama Department of Conservation & Natural Resources